Confidential · Evidence-based · Policy-driven
Fake, retaliatory, and policy-violating reviews get assessed against the platform's own rules — then submitted as a documented case. Eligibility first, payment only on outcome.
Free, confidential, and reviewed by a specialist within one business day.
01 — What we handle
Eligibility is decided by the platform's own rules, not by opinion. We name the rule your case rests on before we submit anything.
Roughly a third of the reviews we audit have no realistic path. Those cases get a written no, not an invoice.
| № | Case type | What it looks like | Policy ground |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Fake & competitor reviews | Accounts with no service history, review swarms inside one week, posts traced to a competing operator. | Conflict of interest |
| 02 | Abusive & off-topic reviews | Slurs, threats, naming staff, or complaints about something the business never sold or served. | Prohibited content |
| 03 | Extortion & incentivised posts | "Refund me or the review stays" — plus paid, traded, and solicited ratings on either side of the ledger. | Fake engagement |
| 04 | Personal information exposure | Home addresses, phone numbers, records, or photographs published in a review or thread without consent. | Privacy rule |
| 05 | Impersonation & fake profiles | Duplicate listings, accounts posing as your brand or leadership, and coordinated harassment campaigns. | Impersonation |
| 06 | Damaging search results & threads | Outdated articles, Reddit threads, and blog posts that surface first on your name or brand. | De-index / suppress |
Platforms covered
Business
Fake and policy-violating reviews quietly cost conversions, hiring, and trust. We submit evidence-backed requests across the major review platforms.
Personal
Harmful posts, impersonating accounts, leaked information, and old records change how people judge you. We resolve or reduce what qualifies.
02 — How we work
Every case runs on the same track. You always know which stage you're in, what evidence it needs, and what lands in your inbox at the end of it.
You send the link and the context. A specialist reads the review against the platform's own policy text — no sales call required.
We name the policy ground, gather account patterns, timestamps, and screenshots, and rank the reviews by strength of case.
Requests go through official reporting channels. If the first decision is a no, we escalate with the next-strongest ground.
We send timestamped confirmation of every resolved item. Only then does an invoice follow, on qualifying cases.
03 — Who we help
Restaurants, clinics, home services, dealerships, and multi-location operators dealing with review attacks.
People whose search results and public record shape hiring, deals, and career outcomes.
Facing impersonation, harassment, leaked personal information, or harmful content under their name.
White-label case handling for marketing and reputation agencies managing client profiles.
Illustrative examples of common case patterns. These are not client testimonials. Outcomes are review-specific and decided by the platform.
Several ratings land in a few days from accounts with no other review history anywhere. The timing and account patterns get documented together rather than reported one by one.
The reviewer describes a service the business does not offer, or an appointment with no corresponding record. The mismatch is evidenced against the platform's own contribution rules.
The default report button gives no reason and no appeal. A documented file naming a specific policy ground gives the reviewer something they can act on.
04 — Questions
Free case review
A specialist reviews your situation privately, tells you honestly what may qualify under platform policy, and explains the path forward.
We'll come back within one business day with an honest read on eligibility and the next step.